Add

Marketing & SEO

Repurpose a Blog Post Into LinkedIn Posts

Turns one article into several distinct LinkedIn posts, each built on a different angle from the source, without exaggerating its claims.

Designed for general-purpose AI assistantsPublished November 2026

Customize

Fill in the fields and the prompt updates. What you type stays in this page and is never saved or sent.

Preview

Turn the article below into LinkedIn posts. Each post should stand alone and give the reader something useful without having to click.

Article URL (to link to): {{article url}}
Audience on LinkedIn: {{audience}}
Goal: start useful conversations and send some readers to the article
My voice: plain, first person, specific, no hype
A sample of how I normally write on LinkedIn: none
Number of posts: 4

Article:
{{article}}

First, list the distinct angles in the article, such as a surprising finding, a mistake to avoid, a step-by-step process, a story, a contrarian point or a checklist. Choose 4 that are meaningfully different from each other, and tell me which part of the article each one draws on.

Write each post with:
- A first line that makes someone want to read the next one, without clickbait or a claim the article does not support.
- A body of short paragraphs, each making one point, between 600 and 1,100 characters in total.
- One idea or takeaway only. Do not summarize the whole article in every post.
- A closing line that is a real question or a plain invitation, with the link included in only one of the posts.
- No more than two hashtags, only if they are specific and relevant, and no emoji unless they appear in my writing sample.

Rules: use only claims, numbers and examples that appear in the article. Do not invent stories, customers, statistics or personal experiences. If a post would be stronger with a personal example, add a line marked [add your own example] and leave it for me to fill in. Do not use phrases such as "game-changer", "unlock", "here's the thing" or "I'm thrilled".

End with a suggested posting order and spacing, and one sentence on which post to try first and why.

3 required fields are empty and will stay as a {{placeholder}} in the copied text.

How to use it

  1. Paste the whole article and the URL. Mention which parts you consider the most useful so the angles follow your priorities.
  2. Give a sample of your own LinkedIn writing so the posts sound like you, not like a template.
  3. Fill each [add your own example] with something that really happened. Personal specifics are what make a post worth reading.
  4. Post them over a couple of weeks and read the comments. The replies tell you which angle your audience actually wants.

Example output

Illustrative only. Real answers depend on your input and the assistant you use.

Angles chosen: (1) the mistake: teams adding tools without a removal rule (section 2); (2) the checklist: five questions before adopting a tool (section 4); (3) the story: the 14-tool team (introduction); (4) the contrarian point: "more integrations" is not a benefit (section 3).

Post 1 (the mistake)
Most teams have a rule for adding a tool. Almost none have a rule for removing one.

When we looked at how a 12-person company ended up with 14 subscriptions, the pattern was the same each time: every tool was added to fix a real problem, and none was ever reviewed afterwards.

Nobody made a bad decision. Each purchase made sense on the day it was approved. The trouble is that "made sense then" quietly turns into "still paying for it now", and no one is responsible for noticing the difference.

A simple fix: when you add a tool, write down what it replaces and the date you will review it. If that date arrives and nobody can say what the tool still does, you have your answer.

[add your own example]

What is the oldest tool your team still pays for but nobody can explain?

(Excerpt: only Post 1 of 4 is shown.)

Posting order: 3, 1, 2, 4, spaced three to four days apart. Try Post 1 first; its question invites replies from many roles.

Tips

Each post should work without the article. If a post is just a teaser, readers have no reason to follow the link.

Do not publish a post whose claim is stronger than what the article supports. A post is more likely to be seen than the article, and a distorted version of your point travels fast.

If the assistant produces near-identical posts, ask it to drop the weakest one and look for an angle in a part of the article it has not used yet.

Back to the Prompt Library

Related prompts

  • Marketing & SEO

    Write an SEO Content Brief

    Builds a content brief from your keyword, audience and competitor notes, with search intent, outline and questions the page must answer.

    Customizable fields
    7 fields

  • Writing & Editing

    Rewrite a Draft in Your Voice

    Learns your voice from your own samples, shows you its read of it, then rewrites a draft to match without adding claims.

    Customizable fields
    4 fields

  • Marketing & SEO

    Cluster Keywords by Search Intent

    Groups a keyword list into topic clusters by search intent and suggests one page per cluster, flagging overlaps that could cannibalize.

    Customizable fields
    6 fields